<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update Become Categorization for Better Results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loveyourfeed.com/update-become-categorization-for-better-results-49.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loveyourfeed.com/update-become-categorization-for-better-results-49.htm</link>
	<description>Data feed optimization for the shopping comparison engines by SingleFeed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:26:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dale S.</title>
		<link>http://www.loveyourfeed.com/update-become-categorization-for-better-results-49.htm/comment-page-1#comment-3012</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2007 01:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loveyourfeed.com/update-become-categorization-for-better-results-49.htm#comment-3012</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good advice if you have a reasonable amount of SKUs, but what happens when you have almost 250k SKUs on 15 different sites?

What is the second best alternative to the proper taxonomy codes? Will providing the section tree from your own website be enough to categorize each product, or is that just a bad idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good advice if you have a reasonable amount of SKUs, but what happens when you have almost 250k SKUs on 15 different sites?</p>
<p>What is the second best alternative to the proper taxonomy codes? Will providing the section tree from your own website be enough to categorize each product, or is that just a bad idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
